
BACK
Microgrids and Resliency Strategies
R. 19-09-009
March 12, 2021
Reply Comments on Track 3 Scoping Memo
Reply Comments on the issue of the appropriateness of standyby charges for microgrids.
SDG&E:
- Agrees with PG&E and others- compensation mechanism of microgrids should not be addressed through standby charges.
- Standby changes reflect long-term planning; resiliency is a need that is immediate and sporadic in nature.
- No one has provided evidence or logic supporting waiver of standby charges.
- SB 1339 states “reduce” barriers to microgrids- not “eliminate.”
SCE:
- Standby charges are rooted in cost causation principles and are designed to recoup the customer’s fair share of utility costs.
- Under no circumstances should the Commission waive standby charges, however small they may be for some customers.
CalAdvocates:
- A standby charge waiver is not appropriate tool to compensate avoided capacity provided by non-renewable resources.
- D. 01-07-027 provides path for standby waivers for non-renewable resources based on “physical assurance” AND the customer agreeing to drop their load proportionally when needed.
Microgrid Resources Coalition:
- Notion of cost-shifting is being wielded to avoid review of whether current charges are poorly justified.
- Allow standby charge waivers - the charge is outdated and not in line with causation.
Update Links