BACK
Microgrids and Resliency Strategies
R. 19-09-009
March 12, 2021

Reply Comments on Track 3 Scoping Memo

Reply Comments on the issue of the appropriateness of standyby charges for microgrids.

SDG&E:

  • Agrees with PG&E and others- compensation mechanism of microgrids should not be addressed through standby charges.
  • Standby changes reflect long-term planning; resiliency is a need that is immediate and sporadic in nature.
  • No one has provided evidence or logic supporting waiver of standby charges.
  • SB 1339 states “reduce” barriers to microgrids- not “eliminate.”

SCE:

  • Standby charges are rooted in cost causation principles and are designed to recoup the customer’s fair share of utility costs.
  • Under no circumstances should the Commission waive standby charges, however small they may be for some customers.

CalAdvocates:

  • A standby charge waiver is not appropriate tool to compensate avoided capacity provided by non-renewable resources.
  • D. 01-07-027 provides path for standby waivers for non-renewable resources based on “physical assurance” AND the customer agreeing to drop their load proportionally when needed.

Microgrid Resources Coalition:

  • Notion of cost-shifting is being wielded to avoid review of whether current charges are poorly justified.
  • Allow standby charge waivers - the charge is outdated and not in line with causation.
Update Links
SEE PROCEEDING
RELATED UPDATES

Client Resources

Land Use

Regulatory

Litigation

About

845 15th Street, Suite 103
San Diego, CA 92101
858-224-3068